Social Media Buttons - Click to Share this Page




Showing posts with label what kind of Christian are you. Show all posts
Showing posts with label what kind of Christian are you. Show all posts

18 November, 2012

What Kind Of Christian Are You? Last Part


This is the third and last part of a series titled :what kind of Christian are you? which was written by a man who who had a heart after Him, and knew Him well.


Charles G. Finney
Three Kinds of Professing Christians
A Lecture to Examine One's Self

Part III.  RELIGION OF PUBLIC OPINION
"For they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God" - John 12:43
 These words were spoken of certain individuals who refused to confess that Jesus was the Christ, because he was extremely unpopular with the scribes and pharisees, and principal people of Jerusalem. 

I have just described a class of professors of religion, who are moved to perform religious exercises by hope and fear.  They are moved sometimes by self-love, and sometimes by selfishness.  Their supreme object is not to glorify God, but to secure their own salvation. 
 There is a plain distinction between self-love, or the simple desire of happiness, and selfishness.  Self-love, the desire of happiness and dread of misery, is constitutional; it is a part of our frame as God made us, as he intended us to be; and its indulgence within the limits of the law of God is not sinful.  Whenever it is indulged contrary to the law of God, it becomes sinful.  When the desire of happiness or the dread of misery becomes the controlling principle, and we prefer our own gratification to some other interest, it becomes selfishness.  When, to avoid pain or obtain happiness, we sacrifice other greater interests, we violate the great law of disinterested benevolence and it is no longer self-love, acting within lawful bounds, but selfishness. 

 You will recollect that this class, and the class I had described before as the real friends of God and man, agree in many things, and if you look only at the things in which they agree, you cannot distinguish between them.  It is only by a close observation of those things in which they differ, that you can see that the main purpose of the latter class is not to glorify God, but to secure their own salvation.  In that way we can see their supreme objective developed, and see that when they do the same things, outwardly, which those do whose supreme objective is to glorify God, they do them from entirely different motives, and consequently the acts themselves are, in the sight of God, of an entirely different character. 

 I intend now to point out the characteristics of the third class of professing Christians, who "love the praise of men more than the praise of God." 
 I would not be understood to imply that a mere regard for reputation has led this class to profess religion.  Religion has always been too unpopular with the great mass of mankind to render it a general thing to become professing Christians from a mere regard to reputation.  But I mean, that where it is not generally unpopular to become a professor of religion, and will not diminish popularity, but will increase it with many, a complex motive operates - the hope of securing happiness in a future world, and that it may increase reputation here.  And thus many are led to profess religion, when after all, on a close examination, it will be seen that the leading object,which is prized beyond anything else, is the good opinion of their fellow men.  Sooner than lose this, they would not profess religion.  Their profession hinges on this. And although they do profess to be sincere Christians, you may see by their conduct, on close examination, that they will do nothing that will forfeit this good opinion of men.  They will not encounter the hatred that they must, if they were to give themselves up to root sin out of the world. (John 15:18) 

I will now mention several things by which you may detect the true character of the class of persons of whom I have been speaking; who make the praise of men their idol, notwithstanding they profess to love God supremely. And they are things by which you can detect your own true characters, if you belong to this class. 

 1.  They do what the apostle Paul says certain persons did in his day, and for that reason they remained ignorant of the true doctrine; they "measure themselves by themselves, and compare themselves among themselves."  (2 Cor. 10:12) 
 There are a vast many individuals, who, instead of making Jesus Christ their standard of comparison, and the Bible their rule of life, manifestly aim at no such thing.  They show that they never seriously dreamed of making the Bible their standard.  The great question with them is, whether they do about as many things in religion, and are about as pious as other people, or as the churches around them.  Their object is to maintain a respectable profession of religion.  Instead of seriously inquiring for themselves, what the Bible requires, and asking how Jesus Christ would act in such and such cases, they are looking simply at the common run of professing Christians, and are satisfied with doing what is commendable in their estimation.  They prove that their object is not so much to do what the Bible lays down as duty, as to do what the great mass of professing Christians do - to do what is respectable, rather than what is right

2.  This class of persons do not trouble themselves about elevating the standard of piety around them. 
 They are not troubled at the fact, that the general standard of Piety is so low in the church, that it is impossible to bring the great mass of sinners to repentance.  They think the standard at the present time is high enough.  Whatever be the standard at the time, it satisfies them.  While the real friends of God and man are complaining of the church, because the standard of piety is so low, and trying to wake up the church to elevate the tone of religion, it all seems to this class of persons like criticalness and a meddlesome disposition.  Just as when Jesus Christ denounced the scribes and pharisees, and leaders of his day, they said, "He hath a devil." "Why, he is denouncing our doctors of divinity, and all our best men, and even dares to call the scribes and pharisees hypocrites, and he tells us that except our righteousness shall exceed theirs, we can in no case enter the kingdom of heaven.  (Matt. 23:13; 5:20)   What a bad spirit he has." 

A large part of the church at the present day have the same attitude, and every effort to open the eyes of the church and to make Christians see that they live so low, so worldly, so much like hypocrites, that it is impossible the work of the Lord should go on, only excites ill will and occasions reproach.  "Oh," they say, "what a bad spirit he shows, so censorious, and so unkind, surely that is anything but the meek, and kind, and loving spirit of the Son of God." They forget how Jesus Christ poured out his anathemas, enough to make the hills of Judea shake, against those that had the reputation of being the most pious people in that day.  Just as if Jesus Christ never said anything severe to anybody, but just fawned over them, and soothed them into his kingdom.  Who does not know that it was the hypocritical spirit exhibited by professors of religion, that roused his soul and moved his indignation, and called forth his burning torrents of denunciation.  He was always complaining of the very people who were set up as patterns of piety, and called them hypocrites, and thundered over their heads the terrible words, "How can ye escape the damnation of hell!"  (Matt.23:33)  
 It is not surprising when so many love the praise of men more than the praise of God, that there should be excitement when the truth is told.  They are very well satisfied with the standard of piety as it is.  They do not seem to know that the lives of the majority of professing Christians are almost as different from the standard of Jesus Christ as light is from darkness. 

3. They make a distinction between those requirements of God that are strongly enforced by public sentiment and those that are not. 
 They are very scrupulous in observing such requirements as public sentiment distinctly favors, while they easily set at nought those which public sentiment does not enforce.  All those sins that are forbidden by public opinion this class of persons abstain from, but they do other things just as bad which are not thus frowned on.  They do those duties which are enforced by public opinion, but not those that are less enforced.  They will not stay away from public worship on the Sabbath, because they could not maintain any reputation for religion at all if they did.  But they neglect things that are just as clearly required in the Word of God.  Where an individual habitually disobeys any command of God, knowing it to be such, it is just as certain as his soul lives, that the obedience he appears to render, is not from a regard to God's authority, or love to God, but from other motives.  He does not, in fact, obey any command of God. The Apostle has settled this question.  "Whosoever," says he, "shall keep the whole law, and offend in one point, is guilty of all,"  (James 2:10)  that is, does not truly keep any one precept of the law. 

Obedience to God's commands implies an obedient state of heart, and therefore nothing is obedience that does not imply a supreme regard to the authority of God.  Now, if a man's heart be right, then whatever God requires he regards as of more importance than anything else.  And if a man regard anything else of superior weight to God's authority, that is his idol. Whatever we supremely regard - that is our god; whether it be reputation, or comfort, or riches, or honor, or whatever it is that we regard supremely, that is the god of our hearts. Whatever a man's reason may be for habitually neglecting anything which he knows to be the command of God, or that he sees to be required to promote the kingdom of Christ, there is demonstration absolute that he regards that as supreme.  There is nothing acceptable to God in any of his services.  Rest assured, all his religion is the religion of public sentiment.  If he neglects anything required by the law of God, because he can pass along in neglect, and public sentiment does not require it; or if he does other things inconsistent with the law of God, merely because public opinion does require it, it is a simple matter of fact, that it is public sentiment to which he yields obedience, in all his conduct, and not a regard to the glory of God. 

How is it with you, beloved? Do you habitually neglect any requirement of God, because it is not sustained and enforced by public sentiment?  If you are a professor of religion, it is to be presumed you do not neglect any requirement that is strongly urged by public sentiment.  But, how is it with others?  Do you not habitually neglect some duties?  Do you not live in some practices acceptable among men, that you know to be contrary to the law of God?  If you do, it is demonstration absolute that you regard the opinions of men more than the judgment of God.  Write down your name, hypocrite

4.  This class of professors are apt to indulge in some sins when they are away from home, that they would not commit at home. 
 Many a man who is temperate at home, when he gets to a distance, will toss off his glass of brandy and water at the table, or step up to the bar and call for liquor without shame; or if they are in Europe, they will go to the theatre.  When I was in the Mediterranean, at Messina, a gentleman asked me if I would go to the theatre with him. "What!  I go to the theatre?  A minister go to the theatre?" "Why," said he, "you are away from home, and no one would know it." "But would not God know it?" It was plain that he thought, although I was a minister, I could go to the theatre when I was away from home.  No matter if God knew it, so long as men did not know it.  And how should he get that idea, but by seeing ministers who would do just such things. 


5.  Another development of the character of these individuals is, that they indulge themselves in secret sin. 
 I am now speaking of something, by which you may know yourselves.  If you allow yourselves in any sins secretly, when you can get along without having any human being know it, know that God sees it, and that he has already written down your name, hypocrite.  You are more afraid of disgrace in the eye of mortals, than of disgrace in the eye of God.  If you loved God supremely, it would be a small thing to you that any and everybody else knew your sins, in comparison with having them known to God.  If tempted to any such thing, you would exclaim, "What! shall I commit sin under the eye of God?" 


 6.  They indulge in secret omissions of duty, which they would not dare to have known to others. 
 They may not practice any secret sins, or indulge in those secret pollutions that are spoken of, but they neglect those duties, that if they were known to neglect, it would be called disreputable to their Christian character.  Such as secret prayer for instance.  They will go to the communion - yes, to the communion! - and appear to be very pious on the Sabbath, and yet, as to private piety, they know nothing of it. Their closet for prayers is unknown to God.  It is easy to see that reputation is their idol.  They dread to lose their reputation more than to offend God. 

 How is it with you?  Is it a fact, that you habitually omit those secret duties, and are more careful to perform your public duties than private ones?  Then what is your character?  Do you need to be told?  "They loved the praise of men more than the praise of God." 

7.  The conscience of this class of persons seems to be formed on other principles than those of the gospel. 
 They seem to have a conscience in those things that are popular, and no conscience at all on those things that are not required by public sentiment. You may preach to them ever so plainly, their duty, and prove it ever so clearly, and even make them confess that it is their duty, and yet so long as public sentiment does not require it, and it is not a matter of reputation, they will continue on in the same way as before.  Show them a "Thus saith the Lord," and make them see that their course is inconsistent with Christian perfection, and contrary to the interests of the kingdom of Christ, and yet they will not change.  They make it manifest that it is not the requirement of God they regard, but the requirement of public opinion.  They love the praise of men more than the praise of God. 


8.  This class of persons generally dread, very much, the thought of being considered fanatical. 
 They are ignorant, practically, of a first principle in religion, that all the world is wrong!  That the public sentiment of the world is all against God, and that every one who intends to serve God must in the first instance set his face against the public sentiment of the world.  They are to take it for granted, that in a world of rebels, public sentiment is as certainly wrong as that there is a controversy with God.  They have never had their eyes open to this fundamental truth, that the world is wrong, and that God's ways are directly over against their ways. Consequently, it is true and always has been true, that "all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution." (2 Tim. 3:12)   They shall be called fanatical, extreme, and the like.  They always have been, and they always will be, as long is the world is wrong. 

 But this class of persons will never go further than is consistent with the opinions worldly men.  They say they must do this and that in order to have influence over such men.  Right over against this is the course of the true friends of God and man.  Their leading aim is to reverse the order of the world, and turn the world upside down, to bring all men to obey God, and all the opinions of men to conform to the word of God, and all the usages and institutions of the world to accord with the spirit of the gospel. 

 9. They are very intent on making friends on both sides. 
 They take the middle course always.  They avoid the reputation of being overly righteous, on the one hand, and on the other hand, of being lax or irreligious.  It has been so for centuries, that a person could maintain a reputable profession of religion without ever being called fanatical.  And the standard is still so low, that probably the great mass of the churches are trying to occupy this middle ground.  They mean to have friends on both sides.  They are not set down as reprobates on the one hand, nor as fanatics or bigots on the other. They are "fashionable Christians!" They may be called fashionable Christians for two reasons.  One is, that their style of religion is popular and fashionable; and the other is, that they generally follow worldly fashions.  Their aim in religion is not to do anything that will disgust the world.  No matter what God requires, they are determined to be so prudent as not to bring on them the censures of the world, nor offend the enemies of God.  They have manifestly more regard to men than to God.  And if they are ever so circumstanced that they must do that which will displease their friends and neighbors, or offend God, they will offend God. If public sentiment clashes with the commands of God, they will yield to public sentiment. 


10.  They will do more to gain the applause of men than to gain the applause of God. 
 This is evident from the fact, that they will yield obedience only to those requirements of God which are sustained by public opinion.  Although they will not exercise self-denial to gain the applause of God, yet they will exercise great self-denial to gain the applause of men. 


11. They are more anxious to know what are the opinions of men about them, than to know what is God's opinion of them. 
 If one of this class is a minister, and preaches a sermon, he is more anxious to know what the people thought of it, than to know what God thought of it.  And if he make anything like a failure, the disgrace of it with men cuts him ten times more than the thought that he has dishonored God, or hindered the salvation of souls.  Just so with an elder, or a member of the church.  If he prays in a meeting, or exhorts, he is more concerned to know what is thought of it, than to know how God is pleased. 

 If such a one has some secret sin found out, he is vastly more distressed about it because he is disgraced than because God is dishonored.  Or if he fall into open sin, when he comes to be met with it, he cares as much again about the disgrace as about the sin of it. They are more anxious about their appearance in the eyes of the world than in the eves of God.  Females of this character are vastly more anxious, when they go to church, how the body shall appear in the eyes of men than how the heart shall appear in the eyes of God.  Everybody can see, at a glance, what this religion is, the moment it is held up to view.  Nobody is at a loss to say what that man's or that woman's name is - it is hypocrite.  They will go in to the house of God with their hearts dark as midnight, while everything in their external appearance is comely and decent.  They must appear well in the eyes of men, no matter how that part is on which God fixes his eye.  The heart may be dark, and disordered, and polluted, and they care not, so long as the eye of man detects no blemish. 

12.  They refuse to confess their sins in the manner which the law of God requires, lest they should lose their reputation among men. 
 If they are ever required to make confession of more than they think consistent with their reputation, they are more anxious as to how it will affect their character, than to know whether God is satisfied. 
 Search your hearts, you that have made confessions, and see which most affects your minds, the question what God thought of it, or what men thought of it, Have you refused to confess what you knew God required, because it would hurt your reputation among men?  Will not God judge your hearts?  Only be honest now, and let it be answered. 

 13.  They will yield to custom what they know to be injurious to the cause of religion, and to the welfare of mankind.  

 14.  They will do things of doubtful character, or things the lawfulness of which they strongly doubt, in obedience to public sentiment.  

 15.  They are often "ashamed" to do their duty, and so much ashamed that they will not do it. 
 Now when a person is so much ashamed to do what God requires as not to do it, it is plain that his own reputation is his idol.  How many do you find who are ashamed to acknowledge Jesus Christ, ashamed to reprove sin in high places or low places, and ashamed to speak out when religion is assailed!  If they supremely regarded God, could they ever be ashamed of doing their duty?  Suppose a man's wife were slandered, would he be ashamed to defend his wife?  By no means.  If his children were abused, would he be ashamed to take their part?  Not if he loved them; it would not be shame that would deter him from defending his wife or children. 

 Now such persons as I am speaking of, will not take decided ground when they are among the enemies of truth, where they would be subject to reproach for doing it.  They are very bold for the truth when among its friends, and will make a great display of their courage.  But when put to the trial, they will sell the Lord Jesus Christ, or deny him before his enemies, and put him to open shame, rather than rebuke wickedness, or speak out in his cause among his enemies. 

 16.  They are often opposed to men, and measures, and things, while they are unpopular and subject to reproach, and when they become popular, fall in with them. 
 Let an individual go through the churches in any section, and wake them up to a revival of religion, and while he is little known, these persons are not backward to speak against him.  But let him go on, gain influence, and they will fall in and commend him and profess to be his warmest friends. 

 This class of persons, as they set with the tide one way, when a man is reproached, so they will set with the tide the other way when he comes to be honored.  There is only one exception.  And that is, when they have become so far committed to the opposition, that they cannot come round without disgrace.  And then they will be silent, until another opportunity comes up for letting out the burning fires that are rankling within them. 

17.  If any measure is proposed to promote religion they are very sensitive and scrupulous not to have anything done that is unpopular.  
 If they live in a city, they ask what will the other churches think of such a measure?  And if it is likely to bring reproach on their church or their minister, in view of the ungodly, or in view of the other churches, they are distressed about it.  No matter how much good it will do, or how many souls it will save, they do not want to have anything done to injure the respectability of their church. 


18.  This class of persons never aim at forming a public sentiment in favor of perfect godliness. 
 The true friends of God and man are always aiming at forming public sentiment, and correcting public sentiment, on all points where it is wrong.  They are set, with all their hearts, to search out all the evils in the world, and to reform the world, and drive out iniquity from the earth.  The other class are always following public sentiment as it is, and feeling after the course of the tide, to go that way, shrinking back from everything that goes in the face of public sentiment.  And they are ready to brand as imprudent, or rash, any man or anything, that goes to stem the tide of public sentiment and turn it the other way. 


 REMARKS 
 1.  It is easy for persons to take credit for their sins, and make themselves believe certain things are acts of piety, which are in fact only acts of hypocrisy.  
 They do the things that outwardly pertain to piety, and they give themselves credit for being pious, when their motives are all corrupt and hollow, and not one of them drawn from a supreme regard to God's authority.  This is manifest from the fact that they do nothing except where God's requirements are backed up by public sentiment.  Unless you aim to do all your duty, and yield obedience in everything, the piety for which you claim credit is mere hypocrisy, and is in fact sin against God. 



2.  There is a great deal more apparent piety in the church than there is real piety. 
 There are many things which sinners suppose are good but which are abominable in the sight of God. 


 3.  But for the love of reputation and the fear of disgrace, how many there are in the church, who would break out into open apostasy.  
 How many are there who know you would break out into open vice, were it not for the restraints of public sentiment, the fear of disgrace, and the desire to gain the credit of virtue?  Where a person is virtuous from a regard to the authority of God, whether public sentiment favor it or frown upon it, that is true piety.  If otherwise, they have their reward.  They do it for the sake of gaining credit in the eyes of men, and they gain it.  But if they expect any favor at the hand of God, they will assuredly be disappointed.  The only reward which God will bestow upon such selfish hypocrites is, that they may be damned. 

 And now I wish to know how many of you will determine to do your duty, and all your duty, according to the will of God, let public sentiment be as it may? Who of you will agree to take the Bible for your rule, Jesus Christ for your pattern, and do what is right, in all cases, whatever man may say or think?  Every one that is not willing to take this ground must regard himself as a stranger to the grace of God.  He is by no means in a state of justification.  If he is not resolved upon doing what he knows to be right, let public sentiment be as it may, it is proof positive that he loves the praise of men more than the praise of God. 
 And let me say to the impenitent sinners.  You see what it is to be a Christian.  It is to be governed by the authority of God IN ALL THINGS, and not by public sentiment, to live not by hopes and fears, but by supreme consecration of yourself unto God.  You see that if you mean to be religious, you must count the cost.  I will not flatter you.  I will never try to coax you to become religious, by keeping back the truth.  If you mean to be Christians, you must give yourselves wholly up to Christ.  You cannot float along to heaven on the waves of public sentiment.  I will not deceive you on this point. 
 Do you ask, sinner, what is to become of all these professors of religion, who are conformed to the world, and who love the praise of men more than the praise of God?  I answer - They will go to hell, with you and with all other hypocrites.  Just as certain as that the friendship of the world is enmity with God. (James 4:4) 
 "Wherefore, come out from among them, my people, and be ye separate, and I will receive you saith the Lord.  I will be a Father to you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters." (2Cor. 6:17) And now, who will do it?  In the church and among sinners, who will do it?  Who?  Who is on the Lord's side?  Who is willing to say, "We will no longer go with the multitude to do evil, but are determined to do the will of God, in all things whatsoever, and let the world think or say of us as it may." 

Please visit my website at www.apprehended.ca

17 November, 2012

What Kind of Christian Are You? Part 2


Finney's attempt to bring us Christians to a place where we can examine ourselves

PART II: LEGAL RELIGION"Who is on the Lord's side?" - Exodus 32:26
 In discoursing from this text, I have mentioned three classes of professors of religion: (1) those who truly love God and man, (2) those who are motivated solely by selfishness in their religious duties, and (3) those who are motivated only by a regard for public opinion.  Now I intend to mention several characteristics of the second class, 
 Those professors who are motivated by self-love or by selfishness. 
 I intend to show how their leading or main purpose in religion develops itself in their conduct.  The conduct of men invariably shows what is their true and main purpose.  A man's character is as his supreme purpose is.  And if you can learn by his conduct what that leading purpose is, then you can know with certainty what his character is. 
 These three classes of professors agree in many things.  But there are certain things in which they differ, and by close observation the difference will be seen in their conduct, from which we infer a difference in their character.  And those points in which they differ belong to the very fundamentals of religion. 
 I will now set forth some of the characteristics of the second class - those who are motivated by self-love, or by selfishness, in whom hope and fear are the main springs of all they do in religion.  And the things that I shall mention make it evident that the individual is motivated by a supreme regard to his own good - that the fear of punishment, or the hope of advantage to himself, is the foundation of all his conduct. 
 1. They make religion a subordinate concern. 
 They show by their conduct that they do not regard religion as the principal business of life, but as subordinate to other things.  They consider religion as something that ought to come in and find a place among other things, as a sort of Sabbath-day business, but not as the grand business of life.  They make a distinction between religious duty and business, and consider them as entirely separate concerns.  Whereas, if they had right views of the matter, they would consider religion as the only business of life, and nothing else either lawful or worth pursuing, any further than as it promotes or serves religion.  If they had the right feeling, religion would characterize all that they do, and it would be manifest that everything they do is an act of obedience to God, or an act of irreligion. 
 2.  Their religious duties are performed as a task, and are not the result of the constraining love of God that burns within them. 
 Such a one does not delight in the exercise of religious affections; and as to communion with God, he knows nothing of it.  He performs prayer as a task.  He betakes himself to religious duties as sick persons take medicine, not because they love it, but because they hope to derive some benefit f rom it. 
 And here let me ask you, Do you enjoy religious exercises, or do you perform them because you hope to receive benefit by them?  Be honest, now, and answer this question, just according to the truth. 
 3. They manifestly possess a legal spirit, and not a gospel spirit. 
 They do rather what they are obliged to do, in religion, and not what they love to do.  They have an eye to the commands of God, and yield obedience to his requirements, in performing religious duties, but do not engage in those things because they love them.  They are always ready to inquire, in regard to duty, not so much how they can do good, as how they can be saved.  The principal object of such a professor of religion is not to save the world, but to save himself. 
 4.  They are motivated by fear much more than by hope. 
 They perform their religious duties chiefly because they dare not omit them.  They have the spirit of slaves, and go about the service of God as slaves go about the service of their master, feeling that they are obliged to do about so much, or be beaten with many stripes.  So these professors feel as if they were obliged to have about so much religion, and perform about so many religious duties, or be lashed by conscience and lose their hopes. 
 5.  Their religion is not only produced by the fear of disgrace or the fear of hell, but it is mostly of a negative character. 
 They satisfy themselves, mostly, with doing nothing that is very bad.  Having no spiritual views, they regard the law of God chiefly as a system of prohibitions, just to guard men from certain sins, and not as a system of benevolence fulfilled by love. And so, if they are moral in their conduct, and rather serious and decent in their general deportment, and perform required amount of religious exercises, this satisfies them.  The most you can say of them is, that they are not very bad.  They seem to think little or nothing of being useful to the cause of Christ, so long as they cannot be convicted of any positive transgression. 
 6.  This class of persons are more or less strict in religious duties, according to the light they have and the sharpness with which conscience pursues them. 
 Where they have enlightened minds and tender consciences, you often find them the most rigid of all professors.  They tithe even to "mint and anise." They are stiff even to moroseness.  They are perfect Pharisees, and carry everything to the greatest extremes so far as outward strictness is concerned. 
 7.  They are more or less miserable in proportion to the tenderness of their conscience. 
 With all their strictness, they cannot but realize that they are great sinners after all: and having no just sense of the gospel justification, this leaves them very unhappy.  And the more enlightened and tender their conscience, the more they are unhappy.  Notwithstanding their strictness, they feel that they come short of their duty, and not having any gospel faith, nor any of that holy anointing of the Holy Spirit that brings peace to the soul, they are unsatisfied, and uneasy, and miserable. 
 Perhaps many of you have seen such persons.  Perhaps some of you are such, and you never knew what it was to feel justified before God, through the blood of Jesus Christ, and you know not what it is to feel that Jesus Christ has accepted and owned you as his.  You never felt in your minds what that is which is spoken of in the text, "There is now no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." (Romans 8:1)   Does such language bring home any warm and practical idea to you, that it is a reality because you experience it in your soul?  Or do you, after all, still feel condemned and guilty, and have no sense of pardoned sin, and no experimental peace with God, or confidence in Jesus Christ. 
 8.  This class of persons are encouraged and cheered by reading the accounts of ancient saints who fell into great sins. 
 They feel wonderfully instructed and edified when they hear the sins of God's people set forth in a strong light.  Then they are comforted and their hopes are wonderfully strengthened.  Instead of feeling humbled and distressed, and feeling that such conduct is so contrary to all religion that they could hardly believe they were saints if it had not been found in the Bible, and that they could not believe at all that persons who should do such things under the light of the Christian dispensation, could be saints; they feel gratified and strengthened, and their hopes are confirmed, by all these things. 
 9.  They are always much better pleased, by how much the lower the standard of piety is held out from the pulpit. 
 If the minister adopts a low standard, and is ready to hope that almost everybody is a Christian, they are pleased and compliment him for his expansive charity, and praise him as such an excellent man, so charitable, etc.  Right over against this, you will see, is the conduct of the man whose main purpose is to rid the world of sin.  He wants all men to be holy, and therefore he wants to have the true standard of holiness held up.  He wants all men to be saved, but he knows they cannot be saved unless they are truly holy.  And he would as soon think of Satan's going to heaven as of getting a man there by frittering away the Bible standard of holiness by "charity." 
 10.  They are fond of having "comfortable" doctrines preached. 
 Such persons are apt to be fond of having the doctrine of saints' perseverance much dwelt on, and the doctrine of election.  Often, they want nothing else but what they call the doctrines of grace.  And if that can be preached in such an abstract way, as to afford them comfort without galling their consciences too much, they are "fed." 
 11.  They love to have their ministers preach sermons "to feed Christians." 
 Their main object is not to save sinners, but to be saved themselves, and therefore they always choose a minister, not for his ability in preaching for the conversion of sinners, but for his talents in feeding the church with mere abstractions. 
 12.  They lay great stress on having "a comfortable hope." 
 You will hear them talking very solemnly about the importance of having a comfortable hope.  If they can only be at ease in their minds, they show very little concern whether anybody else around them is saved or not.  If they can have only their fears silenced and their hopes cherished they have religion enough to satisfy them. 
 In their prayers, you will find the class I am now speaking of, are praying mainly that their evidences may be brightened, and that they may feel assured that they are going to heaven. 
 13.  They are more afraid of punishment than they are of sin. 
 Precisely over against this, you will find the true friends of God and man more afraid of sin than of punishment.  It is not the question with them, "If I do this shall I be punished?" or, "If I do this, will God forgive me?" But the question is that which Joseph asked, "How can I do this great wickedness, and sin against God?" There was the spirit of a child of God, afraid of sin more than punishment, and so much afraid of sin that he had no thought of punishment. 
 This class of persons I am speaking of, often indulge in sin if they can persuade themselves that God will forgive them, or when they think they can repent of it afterwards. 
 They often reason in this way: "Such a minister does this;" or "Such an elder or professor does this, and why may not I do the same?" or "Others get along without doing such and such things, and why should I trouble myself to be better than they?" It is not sin that they fear, but punishment.  They sin, they know, but they hope to escape punishment.  Who cannot see that this is contrary to the spirit of the true friends of God, whose absorbing object it is to get sin - all sin - out of the world, and are not half so much afraid of hell as they are of committing sin? 
 14.  They are more fond of receiving good than of doing good. 
 You may know such persons have not the spirit of the gospel.  They have never entered into the spirit of Jesus Christ, when he said, "It is more blessed to give than to receive." A person actuated by true love to God and man, enjoys what he does to benefit others, far more than they do who receive good at his hand.  He is really benevolent, and it is a gratification to him to show kindness, because his heart is set upon it, and when he can do it, a holy joy is shed over his mind, and he enjoys it exquisitely. 
 The other class are more eager to receive than to impart.  They want to receive comfort, but are never ready to deny themselves to give the comforts of the gospel to others.  How directly contrary this is to the spirit of the gospel, any one can see at a glance.  That spirit finds its supreme happiness in communicating happiness to others.  But this class of persons wants to lay everybody under contribution to impart happiness to themselves, instead of laying themselves out to bless others. 
 Who does not know these two classes of professors?  One always seeking out objects to do good to, the other always trying to gain good themselves.  One anxious to communicate, the other to receive.  One to do good, the other to get good.  These two classes of character are just as opposite as light and darkness. 
 15. If this class of professors pray for the conversion and salvation of others, you may observe that they are motivated by the same kind of considerations as they are when they pray for themselves. 
 They are chiefly afraid of hell themselves, and when they are strongly convicted, they are afraid others will go there too.  They are seeking happiness for themselves, and when self is not in the way, they seek the same for others.  They pray for sinners, not because they have such a sense of the evil of sin which sinners are committing, as because they have such a sense of the terrors of hell to which sinners are going. It is not because sinners dishonor God that they want them converted, but because they are in danger. Their great object in praying is to secure the safety of those they pray for, as it is their great object in religion to secure their own safety.  They pity themselves and they pity others.  If there was no danger, they would have no motive to pray either for themselves or others. 
 The true friends of God and man feel compassion for sinners too, but they feel much more for the honor of God.  They are more distressed to see God abused and dishonored than to see sinners go to hell.  And if God must be forever dishonored or men go to hell - just as certainly as they love God supremely, they will decide that sinners shall sink to endless torments sooner that God fail of his due honor.  And they manifest their true feelings in their prayers.  You hear them praying for sinners as rebels against God, as guilty criminals deserving of eternal wrath, as the enemies of God and the universe; and while they are full of compassion for sinners, they feel also the enkindlings of holy indignation against them for their conduct towards the blessed God. 
 16.  They manifest great uneasiness at the increasing calls for self-denial to do good. 
 This class of persons are in constant distress at being called on to give up so much.  The good that is to be done does not enter into their thoughts, because they are all the while dwelling on what have to give up. 
 It is easily seen why aggressive movements on the kingdom of darkness distress such persons.  Their object never was to search out and banish from this world everything that is dishonorable to God or injurious to man. They never entered upon religion with the determin-ation to clear out every such thing from the earth, as far as they had power, and as fast as they were convinced that it was injurious to themselves or others, in soul or body.  And therefore they are distressed by the move-ments of those who are truly engaged to search out and clear away every evil. 
 These persons are annoyed by the continually increasing calls to give for missions, Bibles, tracts, and the like.  The time was, when a rich man gave twenty-five dollars a year to such things, he was thought to be doing pretty well.  But now there are so many calls for contributions, that they are in torment all the time.  They are obliged to keep giving all the time, in order to keep up their character, or to have any hope, but they are much distressed about it. 
 17.  When they are called upon to exercise self-denial for the sake of doing good, instead of being a pleasant thing, it gives them unmingled pain. 
 Such a one does not know anything about enjoying self-denial.  He cannot understand how self-denial is pleasant, nor how anybody can take pleasure in it, or have joy of heart in denying himself for the sake of doing good to others.  Yet the true friend of God and man, whose heart is fully set to do good, never enjoys any money he expands so well as that which he gives to promote Christ's kingdom.  If he is really pious, he knows that is the best disposition he can make of his money.  Nay, he is sorry to be obliged to use money for anything else, when there are so many opportunities to do good with it. 
 I want you to look at this.  It is easy to see that if an individual has his heart very much set upon anything, all the money he can save for that object is most pleasing to him, and the more he can save from other objects for this that his heart is set on, the better he is pleased.  If an individual finds it hard for him to give money for religious objects, it is easy to see that his heart is not set on it.  If it were, he would have given his money with joy. 
 18.  They do not manifest much distress when they behold sin. 
 They do not rebuke it.  They love to mingle in scenes where sin is committed.  They love to be where they can hear vain conversation, and even to join in it.  They love worldly company and worldly books.  Their spirit is worldly.  Instead of hating even the garment spotted with the flesh,(Jude 23)  they love to hang around the confines of sin, as if they were pleased with it. 
 19. They do not aim at anything higher than a legal, painful, negative religion. 
 The love of Christ does not constrain them to a constant warfare against sin, and a constant watch to do all the good in their power.  But what they do is done only because they think they must.  And they maintain a kind of piety that is formal, heartless, worthless. 
 20. They do not enjoy secret prayer. 
 They do not pray in their closets because they LOVE to pray but because they think it is their duty, and they dare not neglect it. 
 21. They do not enjoy the Bible. 
 They do not read the Bible because it is sweet to their souls, sweeter than honey or the honeycomb. They do not "enjoy" the reading, as a person enjoys the most exquisite delights.  They read it because it is their duty to read it; and it would not do to profess to be a Christian and not read the Bible; but in fact they find it a dry book. 
 22. They do not enjoy prayer meetings. 
 Slight excuses keep them away.  They never go unless they find it necessary for the sake of keeping up appearances, or to maintain their hope.  And when they do go, instead of having their souls melted and fired with love, they are cold, listless, dull, and glad when it is over. 
 23. They find it difficult to appreciate what is meant by disinterestedness (non-self interest). 
 To serve God because they love him, and not for the sake of reward, is what they do not understand. 
 24. Their thoughts are not anxiously fixed upon the question, when shall the world be converted to God? 
 Their hearts are not agonized with such thoughts as this, Oh, how long shall wickedness prevail?  Oh, when shall this wretched world be rid of sin and death?  Oh, when shall men cease to sin against God?  They think more of the question, When shall I die and go to heaven, and get rid of all my trials and cares? 
 REMARKS 
 1.  I believe you will not think me extravagant, when I say that the religion I have described, appears to be the religion of a very large mass in the church. 
 To say the least, it is greatly to be feared that a majority of professing Christians are of this description.  To say this, is neither uncharitable nor censorious. 
 2.  This religion is radically defective. 
 There is nothing of true Christianity in it. It differs from Christianity as much as the Pharisees differed from Christ - as much as gospel religion differs from legal religion. 
 Now, let me ask you, to which of these classes do you belong?  Or are you in neither?  It may be because you are conscious you do not belong to the second class, you may think you belong to the first, when, in fact, you will find, when I come to describe the third class of professors, that I describe your true character. 

Please visit my website www.apprehended.ca